Seemingly, there are two major movements
active right now. The first, “Black Lives Matter” (BLM), highlights the grave
injustices that people of color have endured for several centuries and still
endure. The second, environmentalism (aka, the Environmental Movement (EM)),
demands that humans stem the violence against all forms of life (e.g., the
bees, the bats, the gorillas, the whales, the polar bears, etc.) and begin to
live with nature, not in domination of nature. How does one reconcile these two
important struggles? Do these movements have anything in common? Must they work
in separate domains? Are they mutually exclusive? Does one have to take
precedence in order to make real progress?
These two movements are actually very
connected and interwoven. Once we realize this, they can more clearly work
cohesively and in solidarity.
A little history can serve us in
understanding these two movements. Recall the “Civil Rights Movement” (CRM),
which lasted from the mid-1950s through the 1960s? Recall, when the first Earth
Day occurred and the Environmental Protection Agency was launched—in the early
1970s. Yes, the CRM laid the ground work the environmental movement (as well as
other key movements—women’s and GLBT)! These two huge movements are, thus,
integrally connected.
But, aren’t nearly all environmentalists
“White” and well-off and most BLM activists, people of color (POC)? “Not at
all,” says research into these questions (see Poon, 2018). In fact, since POC
bear the brunt of the worst of environmental degradation (especially globally),
it is no surprise many POC care deeply about environmental issues and express
this concern through demonstrable action. And as anyone who has been to a BLM
event can tell you, there are many Caucasians who are advocates for the justice
that BLM demands (though there is obvious some frustration over who is leading
the cause, see Mann & Baker, 2020). Stereotypes and preconceptions are
sometimes hard to overcome.
But, hold on, “The BLM folks are calling for
justice for victims of police brutality and environmentalists are protesting
for new energy reform to avert catastrophic climate change (C3). Their causes
cannot appear more dissimilar.” But are they really? Actually, they are very
similar. Both demand justice. Both demand action, swift and decisive. Both
recognize that current economic and political practices must be modified and
reimagined. Both want all of us (humans, animals, and plants) to
flourish. In particular, both emphasize that the physical and mental welfare of
humans matters a great deal.
We can see the overlap and interconnection
between BLM and EM most vividly perhaps by considering another movement, the
environmental justice (EJ) one. EJ (or Environmental Racism (ER) as it is often
referred to) is a fast growing component of mainstream environmentalism. Yet it
owns its origin to POC who, in the early 1980s, used non-violent direct action
to protest the dumping of PCBs in a rural (minority) community of North
Carolina. More recent examples of EJ (or ER) struggles can be found in Flint,
Michigan (water contamination) and New Orleans, Louisiana (climate justice).
Additionally, some of the most prominent
environmentalists are POC as well. Robert Bullard, the most prolific author in
the EJ arena, is an African-American who grew up in rural Alabama. Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez, a Hispanic Congresswoman, is one of the most aggressive
promoters of the Green New Deal. David Suzuki, one of the most famous environmentalists
and author of more than a dozen books, is Asian-Canadian. Winona LaDuke, who
ran for U.S. Vice President twice, works tirelessly for many environmental
causes (Honor the Earth and the White Earth Land Recovery Project) and is an
Ojibwe Native American living in Minnesota. Globally, obviously, most
environmental work is performed by POC—Wangari Maathai (Kenya), Ken Saro-Wiwa
(Nigeria), and Vandana Shiva (India) quickly come to mind. Each of these
amazing humans (and there are many, many more—see the long list of
international Goldman Prize recipients, for example) understands the
interconnected nature of humans as well as the critical importance of human
rights as a foundation for the well-being of all life forms.
In the end, struggles to bring justice and
equality are indelibly part of the same whole. The sooner we come to understand
this, BLM and EM advocates can more explicitly connect their struggles and
bring actual peace and sustainability into a nascent LM movement (i.e., LM =
Life Matters).
Yet, this combined effort must recognize one
very important point. Our political economy must serve humanity (rather than
the other way around). We cannot continually privatize essential services and
resources (be they police or tap water). Much of our current economy is based
on “exchange value” which holds that something’s value equates to what it can
be exchanged for. But in this system what is the value afforded a battered
citizen (physically or emotionally) or a dolphin caught as bycatch? The human or
biological system collapses at some point and neither can be replaced (some
changes are irreversible; for more on human crashes due to our economic system,
see Wolff, 2020). Thus, both BLM and EM must fully embrace this realization as
they move forward and build alliances and coalitions in the LM struggle.
References
Mann, B. & E. Baker. (2020) “Black Protest Leaders to White Allies: ‘It’s Our Turn To Lead Our Own Fight.” NPR. September 22. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/22/913094440/black-protest-leaders-to-white-allies-it-s-our-turn-to-lead-our-own-fight
Poon,
L. (2018) “‘Environmentalist’ Doesn’t Just Mean White and Wealthy.” Bloomberg
CityLab. November 2.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-11-02/who-is-an-environmentalist-study-refutes-stereotypes
Wolff, R. D. (2020) “The champions of capitalism are rushing into disaster and refusing to admit their ideology has failed.” Independent Media Institute. April 3. https://www.alternet.org/2020/04/the-champions-of-capitalism-are-rushing-into-disaster-and-refusing-to-admit-their-ideology-has-failed/